Thursday, June 11, 2009

What Causes Arthritis?



from http://www.livinginperu.com/

A drunken man who smelled like beer sat down on a subway next to a priest. The man's tie was stained; his face was plastered with red lipstick, and a half-empty bottle of gin was sticking out of his torn coat pocket.

He opened his newspaper and began reading. After a few minutes the man turned to the priest and asked, "Say Father, what causes arthritis?"

The priest replies, "My son, it's caused by loose living, being with cheap, wicked women, too much alcohol, contempt for your fellow man, sleeping around with prostitutes and lack of a bath." The drunk muttered in response "Well, I'll be damned!" Then returned to his paper.

The priest, thinking about what he had said, nudged the man and apologized. "I'm very sorry. I didn't mean to come on so strong. How long have you had arthritis?"

The drunk answered, "I don't have it, Father. I was just reading here that the Pope does."

MORAL: Make sure you understand the question before offering the answer.

Thursday, June 4, 2009

English soccer clubs rake in $3.4 billion


(CNN) -- European football clubs are bucking the trend of the worldwide recession, with England's Premier League leading the way after posting $3.4 billion in revenues for the 2007-08 season.

The Premier League extended its financial superiority over its nearest rivals in Germany and Spain to more than $1.4 billion, according to Deloitte's Annual Review of Football Finance.

This result from its 20 clubs came despite the British pound's 15 percent devaluation against the Euro currency, Deloitte said.

Italy's Serie A was the fastest growing league, increasing its total revenue by 34 percent to $1.99 billion -- with the return of Turin giants Juventus to the top flight contributing two-thirds of that upturn.

The total European football market grew by $1.4 billion to $20.76 billion, fueled by a $995 million increase in the 'big five' leagues plus the staging of the Euro 2008 finals in Austria and Switzerland.

Deloitte's Dan Jones, one of the authors of the report, said he expected English clubs to continue being profitable despite the uncertain economic climate, but perhaps not at the same "remarkable" rate.

"Between 1992 and 2008, revenues for the top 20 clubs grew at a compound annual rate of 16 percent, compared with 5.4 percent for the UK economy as a whole," he said.

"Revenue increased by 26 percent in 2007/08 and Premier League clubs generated $1.3 million more revenue than their nearest rivals from the other 'big 5' leagues.

"It will, of course, be hard to maintain this pace in the immediate future. The new economic realities may lead to flat match-day revenues. While attendances continue to hold up well, many clubs have frozen or reduced ticket prices.

"However, the stepped increases in the current domestic broadcast deal and the new UEFA Champions League TV deal make it likely overall revenues will edge up."

Deloitte said most of the increased broadcast revenue had been spent on player wages and transfers.

Wage costs in the Premier League soared by $372 million, or 23 percent, in 2007/08 to reach $1.96 billion -- which represented its largest annual increase since its inception in 1992.

Chelsea were the biggest spenders on $282 million, ahead of champions Manchester United ($198 million), Arsenal ($165 million) Liverpool ($148 million) and Newcastle ($123 million) -- whose relegation at the end of the 2008/09 season could have dire financial implications for the club.

Meanwhile, Premier League clubs' spending on player transfers in both the summer 2008 and January 2009 transfer windows reached new record levels with an estimated $1.1 billion paid out.

Deloitte's Alan Switzer commented: "Despite this increase in wage costs, Premier League clubs improved their wages/revenue ratio to 62 percent and generated record operating profits in 2007/08 of £185 million ($303 million).

"However lower revenue growth in forthcoming seasons means clubs will have to focus on improving cost control -- both wages and other operating costs -- if profits are to be maintained."

Deloitte said while the Premier League's total debt had risen, two-thirds of this was taken up by the top four clubs -- Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool and Manchester United -- and around $2 billion of it was non-interest bearing "soft loans".

"On the positive side of the balance sheet, these four clubs also had £1 billion ($1.64 billion) of assets in respect of investment in stadia and other facilities and a further £450m ($738m) from investment in players," said Deloitte's Paul Rawnsley.

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

Grammar challenge: 'ed' and 'ing' adjectives






From www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/


'ed' and 'ing adjectives
There are several adjectives in English that have 2 forms: an -ed form and an -ing form. The -ing form is for things, and the -ed form is used to describe our feelings.

-ed form: amazed, amused, annoyed, astonished, bored, confused, depressed, disappointed, disgusted, embarrassed, excited, exhausted, frightened, insulted, interested, intrigued, satisfied, shocked, surprised, tempted, terrified, tired, worried.

-ing form: amazing, amusing, annoying, astonishing, boring, confusing, depressing, disappointing, disgusting, embarrassing, exciting, exhausting, frightening, insulting, interesting, intriguing, satisfying, shocking, surprising, tempting, terrifying, tiring, worrying.


Adjectives are used to give more information about nouns. They're used with the verb 'to be' or with verbs like look, seem, feel, sound, appear, etc.

-ed adjectives: example sentences
I'm not interested in football.
We were all surprised when they got married.
He was shocked at the news.

The lecture made me feel really bored.
She felt very disappointed with her exam results.
The children looked very tired when they got back from the trip.

-ing adjectives: example sentences
I don't think football is a very interesting game.
Their marriage was very surprising.
They thought the news was shocking.

I'm not going to that lecture: it sounds really boring.
Her exam results seemed disappointing, but the university accepted her anyway.
The trip looks very tiring. We'd better go to bed early tonight.

Friday, May 29, 2009

Grammar Challenge: Questions with 'like'







  1. 1. To ask about someone's personality.
    (We don't use 'like' in the answer)

    What's she/he/it like?
    What are you/we/they like?
    What am I like?

    She's friendly.
    He's grumpy.
    They're very serious.


    2. To ask about someone's physical appearance.
    (We don't use 'like' in the answer)


    What does he/she/it look like?
    What do I/you/we/they look like?

    She's tall and good looking.
    He has green eyes.
    They're both blonde.

    3. To ask about someone's hobbies.
    (You can use 'like' in the answer)

    What does he/she/it like doing?
    What do I/you/we/they like doing?

    She likes sports.
    He's into computers.
    They love sailing and swimming.

Thursday, May 28, 2009

The Global Supply Chain Podcast: Having a great global supply chain







In our last Podcast, we concluded that Globalization is huge and that Globalization is about optimizing one's North American, Europe and Asian resources to achieve a great Global Supply Chain.

The purpose of this podcast is to dig deeper into an understanding of what we mean by a Great Global Supply Chain.

Let me begin with a little reinforcement on the importance of the Supply Chain with a quote from Len Schlesinger, the Vice-Chairman of the Limited Brands,

“So you do not understand the importance of the supply chain to your business? I would love to compete with you.”

It is clear: An organization’s global supply chain can either be the strategic weapon for marketplace victory or the fatal flaw that results in an organization’s failure. Let me repeat: An organization’s global supply chain can either be the strategic weapon for marketplace victory or the fatal flaw that results in an organization’s failure.

I think there are six types of organizations in this world:

Type 1: Organizations that deliver a local service (dentist, landscaper, realtor)
Type 2: Organizations that deal with products and avoid globalization
Type 3: Organizations that deal with products and naively pursue globalization
Type 4: Organizations that deal with products and intelligently pursue globalization
Type 5: Organizations that deliver a Global service and naively pursue globalization
Type 6: Organizations that deliver a Global service and pursue globalization
I believe Type 1, Type 4 and Type 6 will be successful. So either a local service firm or a global products or service firm which intelligently pursues globalization will continue to exist.

Type 2, 3, and 5 organizations who either naively pursue globalization or who try to be in a non-global product business will cease to exist. So we are not discussing profit levels, return on investment or return on assets. We are discussing what companies will continue to flourish, versus the companies that will go out of business.

This global supply chain topic is about survival.

Organizations that get it will be around in the future. The ones who do not will fall prey to the Global Supply Chain Winners!

So, what is a Global Supply Chain? The foundation, the starting point to one's Global Supply Chain is the organization's Global Business strategy. This Global Business strategy at the most basic level is: what products should be sold into what markets.

Once this foundation is understood, then the Global Supply Chain Strategy and execution processes can be put in place. At the most basic, level the Global Supply Chain Strategy and Execution processes that must be put in place involve:

Buy
Make
Move
Store
Sell
These five steps must be pursued from an End-to-End perspective, which is to say:

From supplier’s supplier to customer’s customer
From strategy, plan, design, implementation, and integration
From best practices to information systems in material handling integration
From North America, Europe and Asia to the entire world
From concept economic justification, validation, execution, and results
So we need to do a great job of sourcing, local transport, local store, customers and duty, global transport, domestic store, domestic move, selling and operations planning, merchandizing, selling and product development.

Where product development is really not the end of the supply chain, but the beginning of the next cycle of Global Business Strategy and back into Global Supply Chain Strategy and Execution Processes.

Of course this entire process must be pursued while increasing visibility, reducing risk, increasing speed and enhanced execution management. So what are the factors that make a global supply chain the best?

1. The total delivered cost for the global buy, make, move, store, sell is best-in-class. This is delivered cost to customers, not landed cost at port of entry.

2. The total cycle time for spending money to collecting money is best-in-class. The cash-to-cash cycle is very short, maybe even negative.

3. The entire supply chain is focused on the ultimate customer satisfaction; and speed, perfect orders, on-time performance, no surprises, and continuous improvement are a part of our DNA.

4. The supply chain is agile, adaptable, and responsive to changes in the marketplace.

5. The supply chain is able to recover from disruptions, errors, and risks. The supply chain is resilient.

6. The supply chain is benchmarked against relevant supply chain performance indicators, and best practices are sought out and pursued.

These factors must be addressed while understanding:

80% of North America manufacturing companies are sourcing off-shore.
65% of North American manufacturing companies are distributing to global markets.
80% of North America manufacturing companies are outsourcing some logistics process as well as information technology, financial functions or call centers.
Most companies are concerned with the economy.
Most companies are torn between being a low-cost provider and a high-service provider.
Most CEOs are seeking cost reductions, but also looking for profitable growth.
Many companies are concerned with their lack of standardization in their processes around the world.
Most CEOs are pleased with their reduction in the piece costs, but unpleased with their increasing supply chain costs.
In brief, we live in interesting times, in very interesting times indeed. Managing and leading global supply chains have become one of the great challenges of 2008 and for years to come. The level of Global Supply Chain complexity must be matched with our emphasis of supply chain innovation.

Not stepping up to these Global Supply Chain challenges can be fatal to your company. I encourage you to step up, to transform your Global Supply Chain to truly become best-in-class.

In my next podcast I will help you sort through some of the Myths versus Facts of the role of China and fuel charges on the Global Supply Chain.

Speak to you soon.